Movies TV Shows Blog

First looks : Greta Gerwig's Narnia reimagined

Published on 18/09/2026
Girl with animals near lamp post in snowy forest

On February 12, 2027, Narnia : The Magician's Nephew hits theaters worldwide. A few months later, on April 2, 2027, it lands on Netflix. We track these release windows closely, and trust us : this one has been on our radar for a while. The first preview images, published in Empire Magazine on September 18, 2026, immediately set the internet on fire. Greta Gerwig's take on C.S. Lewis's beloved fantasy world looks nothing like what fans expected, and that's both the point and the problem.

Greta Gerwig's Narnia vision : rock 'n' roll meets a classic fantasy world

Gerwig, known for Barbie (2023) and Little Women (2019), made one bold structural choice right from the start : she didn't begin with The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, the first published novel in the series (1950). Instead, she opened with The Magician's Nephew (1955), the chronologically first story. This lets her build Narnia's creation myth on screen and introduce Jadis as an origin-story villain before she becomes the White Witch of the sequel.

Beyond structure, her aesthetic direction is even more radical. "I wanted a rock opera," she told Empire. "I wanted it to be big and transporting." She cited David Bowie, Paul McCartney, David Gilmour, Pete Townshend, Jimmy Page, and Robert Plant as direct creative influences. Her reasoning is rooted in the text itself : in Lewis's novel, Aslan literally sings Narnia into existence. Gerwig simply swapped the implied orchestral grandeur for glam-rock energy from the '60s and '70s.

The timeline shift is another significant departure. The original novel is set in Edwardian London. Gerwig moves the story forward by more than 50 years, placing it closer to the late 20th century. That means when the franchise eventually reaches The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, the Pevensie children won't be WWII evacuees. Their story will unfold in an entirely different historical context, which will reshape the emotional backbone of the whole series.

One clear visual reference point for Gerwig's approach seems to be David Bowie and Jim Henson's Labyrinth (1986) : a vibrant, glam-infused fantasy world where style and spectacle carry as much weight as story. Whether that fits Narnia specifically is the central question fans are wrestling with.

Faithful to the text or a full reimagining ? A direct comparison

The first-look image shows Jadis, played by Emma Mackey, standing in what appears to be the ruined world of Charn, a dying city bathed in reddish light from a deep red sun. It's a setting that has never appeared in any previous live-action Narnia adaptation, which is one genuine point in Gerwig's favor. She's going where no filmmaker has gone before, at least visually.

But the costume design sparked the sharpest debate. In Pauline Baynes's original illustrations, Jadis wears regal attire and a golden crown. In Gerwig's version, she appears in a disco-inspired, glam-rock dress, a deliberate visual break from the source material. Here's how the two interpretations stack up across key criteria :

Criterion Original novel / illustrations Gerwig's adaptation
Visual tone Regal, classical, mythological Glam-rock, theatrical, disco-inflected
Jadis's costume Golden crown, regal robes Disco-inspired dress, bold styling
Timeline Edwardian London (early 1900s) Shifted forward by 50+ years
Musical influence Implied orchestral/choral creation Rock 'n' roll of the '60s–'70s
Uncle Andrew Tall, thin, grey-haired sorcerer Daniel Craig, steampunk aesthetic

Daniel Craig as Uncle Andrew Ketterley is one of the casting choices that drew less controversy. He describes the character as "the stupidest magician in the world who actually made magic," and physically, he's surprisingly close to Lewis's description : tall, thin, disheveled. The steampunk-leaning design of his office feels like a reasonable creative extension rather than a full rupture with the source material.

As for Narnia's creation itself, Lewis wrote two phases. First, a haunting near-silence : "There were no words. There was hardly even a tune." Then an explosive burst of life : "It was more like what we should call a tune, but it was also far wilder. It made you want to run and jump and climb." That second phase, honestly, does lend itself to a rock-driven interpretation. The first phase, quieter and more spiritual, is harder to reconcile with Gerwig's stated aesthetic.

What fans are saying, and what it means for streaming audiences

Social media reactions on September 17, 2026 broke down into three clear camps :

  1. Fans who feel the changes betray C.S. Lewis's original intent and the character designs specifically
  2. Viewers intrigued by the rock-opera concept as a bold creative gamble
  3. People who find the overall vibe simply too far removed from Narnia to engage with

From our side, tracking where and when audiences will actually watch this matters as much as the creative debate. The theatrical release on February 12, 2027, followed by the Netflix window roughly seven weeks later, places it squarely in a competitive early-2027 slot. For everything coming to the platform around that period, you can check our Netflix release schedule 2026 : upcoming hits.

Gerwig's ambition is real. Reimagining a 70-year-old fantasy series through a glam-rock lens takes genuine conviction. Whether that conviction translates into a film that works for both longtime fans and new audiences is a question only the final cut can answer. The visuals are striking. The casting is solid. The creative logic, if you follow it through Lewis's own text, holds up more than the initial backlash suggests. But the gap between bold idea and successful execution is exactly where adaptations tend to succeed or fail.